The MN Star Tribune endorses Donald Trump for President

In 2004, 2008 and 2012 the Star Tribune endorsed the democratic presidential candidate but not this time:

The case for Trump
We need to turn our backs on the elites, and he’s the one who has emerged as the rebel leader in that cause.

As of today, I have not decided whether I can, in good conscience, vote for a presidential candidate this November.

I have family members who press me to vote against Donald Trump. I have admired friends who press me to vote against Hillary Clinton. I have others who propose a protest vote by staying home or voting for the Green or Libertarian Party candidate.

It is very unlikely that I will be able to stomach voting for Clinton. In our current crisis of elite failure, we do not need in the White House a person with her career-long record of dissimulation and deceit coupled with a pathological need for selfish opportunism and money.

Clinton and her husband epitomize the worst narcissistic excesses of my generation — the baby boomers. From her cruel 1969 put-down of the first African-American ever popularly elected to the U.S. Senate and his dodging military service in Vietnam to their becoming multimillionaires — part of the 1 percent — ostensibly through public service, Hillary and Bill have been at the forefront of baby-boomer selfishness.

For me, the great issue in the election is: Can we overcome the seemingly incorrigible failure of our elite institutions?

Elite failure from politics to Wall Street has become systemic over the last 30 years. It has happened under the baby boomers.

Some point out that great cultures last only about 250 years. Have we Americans now crossed over from outstanding success as a people into terminal decline?

A cancer of inadequacy and careerist self-absorption has eaten away at politics, bureaucracy, education, religion, business, the professions, journalism and culture.

A pervasive cronyism has taken over our capitalism and our government. The rain of good fortune falls on a favored few — both Democrats and Republicans, but only provided they are well-networked. Claims to preferential entitlements rather than putting good character and hard work on the table drive upward mobility.

Our elite’s social utility was well-described, if somewhat colorfully, by Matt Taibbi when he likened Goldman Sachs in 2009 to a “great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”

Our “new class” of cultural, political and economic aristocrats thrives on rent extraction, not market discipline. They make their money on transfer payments from those more vulnerable than they, transfers imposed by rules, regulations, and concentrations of power and influence.

Politics keeps us from working for the common good. Special interests of various kinds win out over ordinary people in the allocation of government favors. Bureaucrats pontificate in their cubicles like gerbils spinning in their wheels. Education serves educators, not students. Religion provides little moral excellence. Business has brought us, first, dot-com excesses, then Enron and WorldCom, then the subprime fiasco, unnecessary high-frequency trading, and rising inequality of income and wealth — and now secular stagnation.

The gatekeepers of justice — lawyers and accountants — serve their paymasters, not us. Doctors and nurses have become institutionalized mechanics keeping close watch on costs and payments. Journalism sells entertainment for profits. Culture indulges narcissism as far as the eye can see, as the ear can hear and as social media can promote.

Political correctness forbids us from speaking the truth. Demanding “safe spaces” for our precious little egos encourages the invidious inequality of multiple standards with resulting disrespect for both truth and the rule of law. Multiculturalism is just another version of hegemonic discourse that marginalizes some for the disproportionate benefit of others.

Even the courts are slipping away from high standards, replacing fidelity to the rule of law with more political and personal — and therefore more prejudiced — manipulation of the written words that are supposed to provide equal justice for all.

Most tellingly for me: What have our elites done since the civil-rights movement (the last great work of the Greatest Generation), really, in truth, in the streets and in our public schools, to overcome the old injustices of slavery and segregation? A lot of money has been spent in remediation, but what has been accomplished? We are still keeping “our eye on the prize” while “holding on” from day to day.

Can Hillary Clinton save us from all this? I think not. She is the queen bee of the status quo, having spent her career building this system up to its present state of degradation.

When she accepted her party’s nomination for the presidency, there was for me one very telling moment in her speech: when she spoke of her mother. For the first time, I felt I was hearing something genuine from her.

As she described her mother, I finally understood who she really is. She has been shaped by her Methodist mother to put the world aright in the same mode as my two grandmothers and one great-grandmother — from the same religious and middle-class background — tried to set things straight, with diligence and in good faith.

Clinton wants to “mother” us into right thinking and right acting. Like my grandmothers and great-grandmother, she is scrupulous about seeing to all the details of our lives so that we — especially the men among us — do not go astray. And my grandmothers and great-grandmother never thought, nor does Clinton think, that criticism of such efforts can ever be justified.

Since Clinton believes that those out of step with her elitist values are “deplorable,” she will never stoop to make the changes that they want to see. She knows better than they do what is right.

But I don’t want to be so bossed around. I want freedom and my individual dignity, and I want her to respect me. I am a baby boomer, too, after all, something of a narcissist in my own way.

But can I vote for Trump? I am not sure, but let me give you the case for “yes” that has some appeal for me.

We need a rebellion against our elite, and Trump has emerged from nowhere as a rebel leader in that cause.

With a cosmic irony fit for a divine justice with a good sense of humor, up from the ranks of narcissistic baby boomers comes one hellbent on upending our elitist system of privilege, cant and irresponsibility.

Trump is crude, ungracious, vulgar in his tastes. He is a social upstart, a parvenu. He is the guest who dominates the social gathering with his insistent and off-color prejudices. But let us not forget Chairman Mao’s insight that “a revolution is not a dinner party.”

Samuel Adams drove the colonies forward to the revolution of 1776; Andrew Jackson opened our politics to the middle class. Neither had much social refinement.

Trump’s populism is a not dissimilar disruptive technology upsetting our political status quo. But it does come, sadly, at a cost to our social harmony.

The strength of his disruptive force can be measured by the intensity of opposition to his ideas and his personality, even among Republicans with good standing in our elite. Because he is an outlier, Trump provokes fear among many in the status quo who retaliate against him without goodwill, some even with loathing, to protect what they feel is working well for them.

In an era of elite failure, Trump serves the important function of making public the fact that our elites have failed. Putting the truth first is a fundamental good, no matter who it is who is willing to speak truth to power.

Second, Trump’s linking our sequestered feelings of something having gone wrong with our country to culprits permits public discussion of what needs to be done now. You can’t fix a problem until you have named it. Trump is a cultural pugilist punching away at trite conventions just when we need to open our minds and turn them away from the pious but superficial certainties and ego-centricities that have brought us to where we grimly are as a divided nation.

Thus, Trump has brought illegal immigration out of the cultural closet to pose the question: Should there be only one law for all Americans or different laws for different people? Metaphorically, Trump rightly asks: “Can we live well as a community with some Americans following the law and others not?”

Third, a Trump administration would be filled with innovators willing and maybe even eager to upset apple carts. They, too, would be upstarts and parvenus in the corridors of power. They would be inexperienced, and his administration would be chaotic. But how else can a nation rejuvenate its elites except by challenging their smug conceits with countervailing emotional energies?

We have never before in our history experienced such elite failure. We have no guide to successful cultural therapy for narcissism or for the tearing down of self-satisfied institutions of command and obedience and then for their successful reconstruction to truly serve the public interest.

Fourth, in giving African-Americans a fair stake in our society, Trump will start a jarring but more honest conversation about what to do. He will break with the elite conventions, entrenched on the left since the end of the civil-rights movement. He will table for our serious consideration the personal goals of self-discipline in education and work that have done so much for Asians, recent African immigrants, Hispanics and those whose ancestors came from Europe.

Fifth, in foreign policy, Trump as president would counter the rising global attraction to tribalism with a more muscular nationalism of our own, responding in kind to the new circumstances in the flows of ideology, power and interest now shaping our security and prosperity.

Finally, in the economy, he will experiment to get growth going again, just as Franklin Roosevelt did during the Great Depression. Risky, yes. But our elites, from the Federal Reserve to Harvard’s Faculty of Economics and Business School, have no good ideas about what we should do to restore growth and prosperity for the middle class, which is the bedrock of our democracy.

Clinton can’t steer us out of elite failure, but Trump might.

Food for thought.

HRCDJT

http://www.startribune.com/the-case-for-trump/393785771/

 

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “The MN Star Tribune endorses Donald Trump for President

  1. This is NOT an endorsement by the newspaper. It’s one of two pieces by writers who are not employees of the paper. This, by businessman Stephen B. Young (you omitted his byline here) is a pro-Trump piece; the other, by Lawrence Jacobs of the University of Minnesota’s Humphrey School of Public Affairs, is pro-Clinton. It’s a standard pro-and-con set of opinion pieces by guest writers. Your deceptive presentation here is typical of Donald Trumps flagrant lies and distortions. Obviously, you’re not journalists.

    Like

      • This is not an endorsement. The paper ran two commentaries, one making the case or Clinton and one making the case for Trump. The commentaries were by members of the community, not the newspaper. The newspaper has not yet endorsed a candidate for president.

        Like

    • NOT TRUE. Minnesota is turning around from tired politicians saying over and over they will get things done, get their votes, and then, do nothing for 4 years, but shuffle paper, go to events, have their picture taken, & take special interest & lobbyists money. WE ARE TIRED OF “POLITICS AS USUAL!” As a reformed Democrat turned Independent, TRUMP IS THE ONE! TRUMP is for helping everyone! He’s the ONLY person to use his own money…he doesn’t have to do this! HE BELIEVES SO MUCH IN AMERICA, HE IS GOING TO DO IT! I WANT CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN! I WANT TO MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN! MAKE AMERICA WORKING AGAIN! MAKE AMERICA WEALTHIER AGAIN! MAKE AMERICA STRONGER AGAIN! MAKE AMERICA THE LEADER AGAIN! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

      Like

  2. Your headline is remarkably (intentionally, perhaps?) deceptive.

    A) there is no paper named the “MN Star Tribune”; B) there is no indication or evidence that the paper named “The Minneapolis Star Tribune” endorsed Donald Trump.

    Like

  3. de·plor·a·ble
    dəˈplôrəb(ə)l/
    noun

    Anyone who doesn’t want their Nation turned into a pile of rocks, covered in goat shit.

    synonyms: patriot, veteran, American.

    Like

  4. I don’t care whether this is an “official” endorsement or not.

    The fact is, all we hear from voters is they are tired of career polticians and those getting wealthy while in office.

    We have exactly the status quo with Clinton.

    And to add to what Charlesjohn Parker stated;
    Not only did CLinton personally refuse multiple requests for enhanced consulate security, she continues to state that “not one person was lost” at Benghazi.

    As for Trump, well, he’s not the perfect candidate and I doubt there ever was one.
    But he is not status quo.

    Doesn’t it make you wonder what’s going on when people in both parties oppose him?

    It seems to me he’s the guy to upset the financial apple cart for these people.

    The media hates him because they can’t manipulate him. He also doesnt let them get away with twidting his words. Simple enough there.

    Trump has experience making deals that benefit him. The presidency to him is his being CEO of the country.
    The deals he makes are personal to him and losing is not an option. Which is good for us.

    The plain truth is that the rest of the world hates the United States. Period. Enemy and allies alike. So Trump isn’t going to piss anyone off anymore than they already are.

    In fact, I think a Trump presidency scares the hell out of them for one simple reason: The end of the gravy train for them. In both aid and trade no more sweetheart deals.

    What would $800 in additional trade revenue (nearly 1/3 of our current budget) a year do for our economy?

    The bottom line is we’ve been going down the same path forever.
    The consensus of the public as I understand it no matter left or right is that it’s the wrong path. So why vote for Hillary to continue on the same way?

    Seems to me of you want someone who can work with “both sides of the aisle” (nobody in power really wants that because they have to actually compromise) then this is the guy.

    Rant over.

    Like

  5. Open Letter to Donald Trump

    Dear Mr. Trump,

    I want to encourage you in the midst of all the negativity that you are experiencing. As you have reminded us many times, you didn’t have to go through the pressure and scrutiny of a presidential campaign – but you have chosen to do so because of your genuine love and concern for our country. I believe you are correct when you say America is in trouble but that there are things that can be done to make it great again. I believe that America’s greatness has been stifled by self-serving leaders in both the Democratic and Republican Parties.

    In the midst of continual criticism, you have exhibited the kind of strength and resolve that reveals you as a true leader. I believe this strength and tenacity is ultimately from God. I don’t want to make this letter “preachy”, but I do see many spiritual principles at work – both in your life and in the life of our wonderful country.

    I believe that ultimately it is God who is in control of this election. Daniel 2:21 says “… He (God) deposes kings and raises up others. He gives wisdom to the wise and knowledge to the discerning.” We don’t have Kings in this country, but we do elect a President – and the great need for a successful President is Wisdom from God – and the courage to act on what he or she knows to be true.

    I believe that it is no accident that God raised you up at this time. You have done more than anyone to get people involved in deciding the future of our country. I have been, and will continue, to pray for you that you will have wisdom to respond to all of the challenges that you face. I will also pray for your family, as I know from experience the pressure they are under at a time like this.

    Right now the issue seems to be on the words you spoke many years ago. I have no doubt that you regret them and wish they had never been spoken. But words are like feathers in the wind – once spoken they cannot be taken back. But they can be acknowledged – and I appreciate your candor in taking responsibility for them and apologizing for them. As I listen to all the criticism you are receiving, I am reminded of Jesus’ words “Let him who is without sin, cast the first stone.” It is human nature to be critical and judge others – but it reveals God’s work in us when we can love and forgive and see that we are all in process. I am reminded that one of the greatest individuals in the Bible – the Apostle Paul – had been one of the greatest persecutors of the church until he met the risen Christ on the Damascus Road.

    I believe we can learn from the past, but that we shouldn’t be held back by the past. The words you spoke years ago shouldn’t, in my opinion, derail you today. I believe this whole campaign has been a humbling experience for you – but the upside of this is that God “gives Grace to the humble.” I have sensed a change in you from the time you first announced your candidacy until now. I encourage you to keep trusting Him – because regardless of the outcome of this election, He is still in control (Proverbs 3:5,6).

    My motto has always been “actions speak louder than words.” Your actions of putting women in high positions of leadership in your different businesses, in my opinion, speaks louder than the words you spoke years ago. I hope that in the last days of the campaign many of these women will speak out and reveal the real Donald Trump.

    I also am a firm believer in “results, not excuses.” Right now there is a plethora of words and excuses in the leadership of both parties. It is time for action – a time to change the direction of our country and a time to unleash the greatness of America.

    Ultimately I believe what is needed in our country is a spiritual revolution (also called a revival). It says on our coinage “In God We Trust.” We have been turning from Him for too long. Perhaps the one verse that Americans need to be reminded of is 2 Chronicles 7:14: “If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.”

    I will continue to pray for you and your campaign. May God bless you and give you strength in the days ahead.

    Joyfully,

    Rev. Alan P. Naumann Minneapolis, Minnesota

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s